You do not have to pick a topic: the site builds a practice of 12 tasks from your answers in Chemistry tests. Take it as often as you like — each next one uses your new answers.
For parents: a month of Pro costs about as much as half an hour with a Chemistry tutor.
Below is an example: this is how the page looks with Pro. Yours will show your own topics and points.
Each NMT topic in Chemistry splits into subtopics, and each subtopic has a status: you know it, still learning or new to you. The status comes from your answers: “you know it” means you have solved the subtopic correctly several times on different days.
21of 40 NMT test points in Chemistry
This is what the subtopics you are still learning and the new ones are worth. Test points are points for correct NMT tasks; for admission they are converted to a 100–200 score using the official table.
Most of the 12 tasks come from subtopics where you make mistakes and lose points. A few come from the ones you already know, to check they have not slipped. After each practice the next one is built anew.
Subtopics you already know come back for a check now and then — 2 tasks, so they stay with you until the NMT. When it is time, we remind you with the bell on the site.
This is how many NMT test points in Chemistry the subtopics you already know are worth.
19of 40 test points
Each dot on the chart is one practice.
199 ₴ a month or 899 ₴ for the whole admission, until August 31, 2027
No card needed. Pro turns off by itself, no money is charged.
From your answers in all Chemistry tests: full tests, topic tests and the practice itself. The more answers there are, the more precisely the site sees your weak subtopics. If you have no tests yet, your first practice is made of subtopics that are new to you, and a full test shows all topics at once.
As many as you like: the site builds each next practice anew, from other subtopics. But several practices on different days usually give more than the same amount in one evening. A meta-analysis of 317 memory experiments showed this (Cepeda and colleagues, 2006).
Yes, but it does not replace lessons: the practice gives you tasks from the topics where you make mistakes and shows what already works. Take rules and formulas from a textbook or lessons, and check here how they work in NMT tasks.
We do not promise an NMT score: it depends on how much you practise. The practice makes sure that time goes to the topics where you lose points, and builds the test on learning research: topics mixed together, a little on each, and bringing back what you learned on other days. Why exactly this way — below.
That way it is easier to tell similar things apart: in a study by Eglington and Kang (2017), students learned to recognise classes of organic compounds from diagrams of their structure. When the classes came mixed rather than one by one, two days later they recognised new compounds better.
More at once helps only briefly: in a study by Rohrer and colleagues (2005), students learned city–country pairs. Groups who went through the list 20 times instead of 5 recalled 70% of the pairs versus 31% a week later, but only 24% versus 17% after 9 weeks. So a weak topic comes back in several practices.
So you do not forget them before the NMT. When to bring a topic back depends on the time left until the exam: in a study by Cepeda and colleagues (2008), where 1,354 adults learned facts, the best gap grew with the time until the test. So the closer the NMT, the more often what you learned comes back for a check.
